[erlang-bugs] Problem with binary_to_integer/1 and list_to_integer/1 (QuickCheck test case)
Mikael Pettersson
mikpelinux@REDACTED
Mon Aug 18 14:58:08 CEST 2014
Lukas Larsson writes:
> Hello Jesper,
>
> There seems to be a bug in the generic c-code for binary/list_to_integer
> for that specific value where a bignum is returned when a small should
> have been returned. If no-one feels like submitting a patch to fix it,
> I'll take a look later this week.
>
> Thanks for the bug report!
Using hipe_bifs:show_term/1 it's easy to determine why ==/2 fails:
1> A = -576460752303423488.
-576460752303423488
2> B = binary_to_integer(integer_to_binary(A)).
-576460752303423488
3> A == B.
false
4> hipe_bifs:show_term(A).
0x800000000000000f
-576460752303423488
true
5> hipe_bifs:show_term(B).
0x00007f4f8d4ae5fa
0x00007f4f8d4ae5f8: 0x000000000000004c
0x00007f4f8d4ae600: 0x0800000000000000
-576460752303423488
true
That is, A is a fixnum but B became a bignum. That's not allowed
in the VM: every integer that fits in a fixnum MUST be a fixnum.
The bug also exists in R16B03-1. R15 doesn't seem to have
integer_to_binary/1.
>
> Lukas
> On 18/08/14 14:36, Jesper Louis Andersen wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > While working on transit-erlang, Isaiah Peng and I found what we
> > believe to be a bug in the Erlang compiler:
> >
> > 9> A = -576460752303423488.
> > -576460752303423488
> > 10> B = binary_to_integer(integer_to_binary(A)).
> > -576460752303423488
> > 11> A == B.
> > false
> > 12> A.
> > -576460752303423488
> > 13> B.
> > -576460752303423488
> > 14>
> >
> > I expected command 11 (A == B) to return true, as the numbers are the
> > same. But it looks like constants are not treated the same way as
> > converted vaues for some reason and the equality test fails.
> >
> > This fails in the interpreter and in compiled code. It *also* fails
> > with list_to_integer/1 and integer_to_list/1. The number is not
> > chosen arbitrarily. It is -1 * 2^59 which is a borderline number on a
> > 64bit machine. (OTP release 17.1). Isaiah notes that these borderline
> > numbers are not caught by the OTP test cases. They probably should be.
> >
> > In the interest of full exploration, I've written a QuickCheck test
> > case to catch the remaining trouble. It explicitly tests the
> > borderline numbers and only finds this error.
> >
> > https://gist.github.com/jlouis/52b68d9d4150af3bd00c
> >
> > -module(integer_coding).
> >
> > -compile(export_all).
> >
> > -include_lib("eqc/include/eqc.hrl").
> >
> > power(_N, 0) -> 1;
> > power(N, P) -> N * power(N, P-1).
> >
> > perturb() ->
> > elements([0, 1, -1, 2, -2, 3, -3, 4, -4, 5, -5]).
> >
> > sign() ->
> > elements([1, -1]).
> >
> > nat_power() ->
> > frequency([{1, elements([27, 28, 29, 31, 32, 33, 59, 60, 61, 63, 64, 65])},
> > {1, nat()}]).
> >
> > interesting_int() ->
> > ?LET({K, Sign, Perturb}, {nat_power(), sign(), perturb()},
> > power(2, K)*Sign + Perturb).
> >
> > prop_binary_iso() ->
> > ?FORALL(K, interesting_int(),
> > begin
> > I = binary_to_integer(integer_to_binary(K)),
> > I == K
> > end).
> >
> > prop_list_iso() ->
> > ?FORALL(K, interesting_int(),
> > begin
> > I = list_to_integer(integer_to_list(K)),
> > I == K
> > end).
> >
> > all() ->
> > eqc:module({numtests, 3000}, ?MODULE).
> >
> > t() ->
> > eqc:quickcheck(eqc:testing_time(300, prop_binary_iso())).
> >
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > Produces:
> >
> > 8> integer_coding:all().
> > prop_list_iso: .........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................Failed! After 1498 tests.
> > -576460752303423488
> > prop_binary_iso: ...........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................Failed! After 588 tests.
> > -576460752303423488
> > [prop_list_iso,prop_binary_iso]
> > 9>
> >
> > --
> > J.
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > erlang-bugs mailing list
> > erlang-bugs@REDACTED
> > http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-bugs
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> erlang-bugs mailing list
> erlang-bugs@REDACTED
> http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-bugs
--
More information about the erlang-bugs
mailing list