[erlang-bugs] Schedulers getting "stuck", part II

Tim Watson watson.timothy@REDACTED
Wed May 1 13:32:42 CEST 2013


On 30 Apr 2013, at 23:13, Scott Lystig Fritchie <fritchie@REDACTED> wrote:
> 
> ... when also using "+scl false +zdnfgtse 500:500".
> 

Does dnfgtse stand for what I think it does? :)


More information about the erlang-bugs mailing list