[erlang-bugs] R15B01 erlang:now() jumping ~24 days into the future
Patrik Nyblom
pan@REDACTED
Tue Mar 12 14:38:28 CET 2013
Hi!
There's a patched version of the R15B02 dll in my public dropbox, under
the name r15.beam.smp.dll:
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/17212223/r15.beam.smp.dll
If you replace the R15 beam.smp.dll with this one, the werl slogan
should contain the version erts-5.9.2.0.1, if you could try that on the
real app, I would be immensely grateful!
Cheers,
/Patrik
On 03/12/2013 02:09 PM, Vance Shipley wrote:
>
> C
>
> On Mar 5, 2013 6:56 AM, "Garret Smith" <garret.smith@REDACTED
> <mailto:garret.smith@REDACTED>> wrote:
>
> I have been beating my head against a wall for weeks tracking down
> spooky behaviour[sic] in one of our production systems. I finally
> tracked it down to "jumps" in the times returned by erlang:now(),
> causing all timers in the system to expire at once. I have
> witnessed this bug on R15B01, both 64 and 32-bit versions running
> on Windows Server 2008 R2, both on bare metal and VirtualBox VM.
>
> The time jump is always around 2126000 seconds, or a little over
> 24 days. The now() time does not try to converge with
> os:timestamp() as the documentation suggests, and as I confirmed
> it does if you just change the system clock.
>
> Another VM running concurrently on the same machine but with
> little load (diagnostic node & production node) did not time jump.
>
> Higher load seems to make the time jumps happen more often.
>
> Frequency between time jumps varies between seconds and hours, but
> when a jump occurs, it is always 2126000 + (9 to 26) seconds.
>
> I never see the jump in logfile timestamps that use os:timestamp()
> for tagging log messages. I had to start tracing a production
> node before I caught the jump. Here are some lines from a trace,
> where the timestamp in trace_ts is printed using
> calendar:now_to_local_time() and then in raw tuple format:
>
> 2013-4-16 21:40:1.993399|{1366,173601,993399}
> 2013-4-16 21:40:1.993400|{1366,173601,993400}
> 2013-5-11 12:13:41.986961|{1368,299621,986961}
> 2013-5-11 12:13:41.986962|{1368,299621,986962}
>
> then a bit later...
>
> 2013-5-11 12:36:19.955129|{1368,300979,955129}
> 2013-5-11 12:36:19.955130|{1368,300979,955130}
> 2013-6-5 3:9:49.538830|{1370,426989,538830}
> 2013-6-5 3:9:49.538833|{1370,426989,538833}
>
> I captured many such jumps over the course of a day or so.
> Obviously from the dates, 2 jumps happened before I started tracing.
>
> I was able to reproduce the bug, though not as efficiently as my
> production system, with the following sample program:
> https://gist.github.com/garret-smith/5087169
>
> It took over an hour of runtime before the first time jump. I am
> working on a better way to reproduce it at the moment, but it's
> hard to test the test with a bug so intermittent.
>
> I am also testing various other VM versions. My first hope was
> that this was limited to the 64-bit version where we first
> encountered the problem, but a change to the 32-bit version has
> only made the problem happen less often, not eliminated it.
>
> We never saw this bug with R14B03 which we were running previously
> to R15B01. However, system load is different so I can't make a
> direct comparison. I did notice a few significant updates to the
> Windows time related code between R14B03 and R15:
>
> git log sys_time.c
>
> commit 46eb4359b05b220861453a869dc734480ec045a6
> Author: Patrik Nyblom <pan@REDACTED <mailto:pan@REDACTED>>
> Date: Tue Dec 6 19:07:16 2011 +0100
>
> Emulate localtime, gmtime and mktime to enable negative time_t
>
> commit 913f05af100e98a8665bbb6168e89fbcfe4ece75
> Author: Bj<C3><B6>rn-Egil Dahlberg <egil@REDACTED
> <mailto:egil@REDACTED>>
> Date: Fri Dec 2 15:25:06 2011 +0100
>
> Teach windows sys_localtime_r
>
>
> I am completely stumped. What can I do next to help track down
> the source of the bug?
>
> Thanks,
> Garret Smith
>
> _______________________________________________
> erlang-bugs mailing list
> erlang-bugs@REDACTED <mailto:erlang-bugs@REDACTED>
> http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-bugs
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> erlang-bugs mailing list
> erlang-bugs@REDACTED
> http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-bugs
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-bugs/attachments/20130312/394bad4d/attachment.htm>
More information about the erlang-bugs
mailing list