[erlang-bugs] Spec or Dialyzer regression
Tuncer Ayaz
tuncer.ayaz@REDACTED
Sat Sep 29 18:37:29 CEST 2012
On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 7:43 PM, Tuncer Ayaz wrote:
> On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 4:54 PM, Tuncer Ayaz wrote:
>> On Wed, 16 May 2012 01:24:21 +0200, Tuncer Ayaz wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 10:24 PM, Kostis Sagonas wrote:
>>> > On 05/15/2012 09:50 PM, Tuncer Ayaz wrote:
>>> > >
>>> > > There seems to be a spec or Dialyzer regression in otp master
>>> > > revealed when dialyzing rebar.
>>> >
>>> > Since Tuncer did not submit all the info he has, let me add that the
>>> > behavior reported in his mail exists in the *master* branch of OTP
>>> > and *not* in the maint branch which works correctly in rebar's code
>>> > base.
>>>
>>> Forgot to test with maint, but will do. That's why it's not mentioned.
>>
>> Checked, maint results are the same as R15B01.
>>
>>> > It's unlikely that this is a dialyzer issue, as AFAIK dialyzer's
>>> > code is the same in these two branches, but it's most likely either
>>> > due to some erroneous spec that was introduced/changed in the master
>>> > branch or a problem in rebar's code base.
>>>
>>> Upon review of the rebar code which provokes the warnings, the
>>> substantial changes to erl_bif_types seem like a good candidate for
>>> further analysis (commits bd941f50 03715097 9d870a01). Maybe the
>>> changes are not finished yet.
>>>
>>> > IMO, Tuncer should have checked the latter before filling the
>>> > report. It would be nice if he did that.
>>>
>>> That's a good idea. I will git bisect rebar.
>>
>> Done, found no erroneous commit in rebar.
>
> Any update on this bug?
Same problem with today's OTP_R15B02-603-gcccf365.
http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-bugs/2012-May/002902.html
More information about the erlang-bugs
mailing list