[erlang-bugs] Erlang doesn't connect with "short" long names

Vincenzo Maggio maggio.vincenzo@REDACTED
Fri Jul 29 14:24:57 CEST 2011


Hi Lukas,
thanks for the tip, I'll look into it ASAP.

Vincenzo

Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2011 12:31:33 +0200
From: lukas@REDACTED
To: erlang-bugs@REDACTED; maggio.vincenzo@REDACTED
Subject: Re: [erlang-bugs] Erlang doesn't connect with "short" long names



  


    
  
  
    Hello!

    

    If you feel like something is missing to the documentation, please
    take the time to add it and submit a patch so that it will be
    clearer to others how Erlang/OTP works. 

    

    The source for the documentation in question can be found here:
    https://github.com/erlang/otp/blob/dev/erts/doc/src/epmd.xml

    

    Lukas

    

    On 29/07/11 12:14, Vincenzo Maggio wrote:
    
      
      
        Hi,

        you are perfectly right, nslookup reckons mydomain.com (what a
        bad luck, I didn't think that someone could register
        "mydomain.com"!) but not b.c.

        What misled me is the fact that I thought that being on the same
        host, the epmd deamon could manage to ping the nodes because I
        added them to hosts file.

        Indeed, when you issue 'epmd -nodes' it recognizes the nodes
        names (like 'a' and 'b') without the host and domain part, so I
        thought that epmd simply uses a simple host lookup, not a domain
        lookup.

        I think that it should be pointed out in erlang docs that epmd
        uses nslookup to route requests between nodes.

        As far as you know, is this the right place for this kind of
        suggestions?

        

        Many thanks for the help!!!

        

        Vincent

        

        > Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2011 09:02:56 +0200

          > From: ess@REDACTED

          > To: maggio.vincenzo@REDACTED

          > CC: erlang-bugs@REDACTED

          > Subject: Re: [erlang-bugs] Erlang doesn't connect with
          "short" long names

          > 

          > Shinji Ikari wrote:

          > > Hello,

          > > the problem, on my laptop (Win XP SP3, OTP/R14B3),
          can be simply 

          > > replicated with starting two nodes with "short" long
          names and try to 

          > > connect them:

          > >

          > > c:\> erl -name a@REDACTED

          > > (a@REDACTED)1>

          > >

          > > and

          > Does the host in question in fact have the name 'a.b.c'?

          > I.e. if you run "nslookup a.b.c", do you get the IP of
          the machine on 

          > which you're starting that node?

          > Otherwise, what you try is not expected to work.

          > >

          > > c:\> erl -name b@REDACTED

          > > (b@REDACTED)1>net_adm:ping(a@REDACTED).

          > > pang

          > > (b@REDACTED)2>nodes().

          > > [] -----> as expected after a 'pang'!

          > >

          > > So Erlang doesn't seem to connect this way. But if
          you simply:

          > >

          > > c:\> erl -name a@REDACTED

          > > (a@REDACTED)1>

          > >

          > > c:\> erl -name b@REDACTED

          > >
          (b@REDACTED)1>net_adm:ping(a@REDACTED).

          > > pong

          > > (b@REDACTED)1>nodes().

          > > [a@REDACTED] -----------> as expected after
          a 'pong'!

          > >

          > >

          > > Really, no clue here, I've also checked standard
          rules for domain 

          > > names: there is an upper limit (63 characters) but
          no lower limit, AFAIK.

          > >

          > > Thanks in advance!

          > >

          > > Vincent

          > 

        
      
      
_______________________________________________
erlang-bugs mailing list
erlang-bugs@REDACTED
http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-bugs

     		 	   		  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-bugs/attachments/20110729/1dd24170/attachment.htm>


More information about the erlang-bugs mailing list