[erlang-bugs] R13B04 inet_res:resolve/4 inet_udp Port leak

Bob Ippolito bob@REDACTED
Thu May 27 16:11:03 CEST 2010


I can confirm that the first commit fixes the port leak bug.

On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 3:02 AM, Raimo Niskanen
<raimo+erlang-bugs@REDACTED> wrote:
> I have created a fix for these problems:
>    git fetch git://github.com/RaimoNiskanen/otp.git rn/resolver-leaking-ports
>
> It will be included in 'pu'.
>
> Unfortunately, the second commit eliminates the bug trigger
> for what the first commit fixes. So to test if the bug fix
> is fixing the bug, one should apply the first commit only.
>
> On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 09:43:54AM +0200, Raimo Niskanen wrote:
>> On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 11:59:26AM -0700, Bob Ippolito wrote:
>> > Here's the DNS packet that is being received as a response to the query:
>> >
>> > 1> inet_dns:decode(<<0,1,131,128,0,1,0,60,0,0,0,0,8,109,111,99,104,105,115,118,110,
>> > 3,101,114,108,10,109,111,99,104,105,109,101,100,105,97,3,110,
>> > 101,116,0,0,1,0,1>>).
>> > {error,fmt}
>>
>> Thank you very much! I was about to give you detailed instructions
>> about how to dig that up :-)
>>
>> I have spotted the problem.
>>
>> The DNS reply packet has got the TC (TrunCation) bit set and claims to contain
>> 60 answer records, but actually contains zero. inet_dns expects to find
>> 60 answer records if it says so. This is a hazy part of the
>> DNS specifications and the resolver I tested truncation on did
>> not do this kind of self-contradiction, but it _may_ be allowed
>> by the specification...
>>
>> I regard it as a bug (or at least need-to-fix-problem) in inet_dns
>> since it should be real-world compatible not just specification compatible.
>> It should allow record shortage in a section if the TC bit is set.
>> I'll try to fix it in R14A.
>>
>> Can you try my patch adding a missing udp_close(S) to see
>> if it stops the leaking port problem? That is a more serious bug.
>>
>> >
>> > On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 8:02 AM, Bob Ippolito <bob@REDACTED> wrote:
>> > > Well, I'm not sure exactly which scenario is happening because I
>> > > haven't looked at the packets yet, but the manual TCP retry is
>> > > required.
>> > >
>> > > mochi@REDACTED:~$ /mochi/opt/erlang-R13B04/bin/erl
>> > > Erlang R13B04 (erts-5.7.5) [source] [64-bit] [smp:8:8] [rq:8]
>> > > [async-threads:4] [hipe] [kernel-poll:true]
>> > >
>> > > Eshell V5.7.5  (abort with ^G)
>> > > 1> lists:filter(fun erlang:is_port/1, element(2,
>> > > erlang:process_info(self(), links))).
>> > > []
>> > > 2> inet_res:resolve("mochisvn.erl.mochimedia.net", in, a, []).
>> > > {error,timeout}
>> > > 3> lists:filter(fun erlang:is_port/1, element(2,
>> > > erlang:process_info(self(), links))).
>> > > [#Port<0.514>]
>> > > 4> element(1, inet_res:resolve("mochisvn.erl.mochimedia.net", in, a, [usevc])).
>> > > ok
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 2:06 AM, Raimo Niskanen
>> > > <raimo+erlang-bugs@REDACTED> wrote:
>> > >> By reading the code it seems there is a bug when all nameservers
>> > >> return an answer that causes decode errors, or can not be
>> > >> contacted (enetunreach or econnrefused); then an
>> > >> UDP port (or maybe two; one inet and one inet6) is leaked
>> > >> since the inet_res:udp_close/1 is not called.
>> > >>
>> > >> This should be fixed with:
>> > >>
>> > >> diff --git a/lib/kernel/src/inet_res.erl b/lib/kernel/src/inet_res.erl
>> > >> index 9b9e078..3d38a01 100644
>> > >> --- a/lib/kernel/src/inet_res.erl
>> > >> +++ b/lib/kernel/src/inet_res.erl
>> > >> @@ -592,6 +592,7 @@ query_retries(_Q, _NSs, _Timer, Retry, Retry, S) ->
>> > >>  query_retries(Q, NSs, Timer, Retry, I, S0) ->
>> > >>     Num = length(NSs),
>> > >>     if Num =:= 0 ->
>> > >> +           udp_close(S),
>> > >>            {error,timeout};
>> > >>        true ->
>> > >>            case query_nss(Q, NSs, Timer, Retry, I, S0, []) of
>> > >>
>> > >> This "retry with TCP" trick of yours should really not be necessary
>> > >> since inet_res retries with TCP if it gets a truncated UDP answer.
>> > >> Have you got some other case when retrying with TCP is essential?
>> > >>
>> > >> Or, does your DNS server produce a (valid?) result that
>> > >> triggers a debug bug in inet_res, causing the decode error,
>> > >> triggering the port leak bug, forcing you to retry with TCP?
>> > >>
>> > >> On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 05:00:39PM -0700, Bob Ippolito wrote:
>> > >>> It appears that there may be an inet_udp Port leak in
>> > >>> inet_res:resolve/4, our current workaround is to spawn a new process
>> > >>> to call this function. We've noticed this primarily for a service that
>> > >>> regularly does a UDP DNS query that fails (because the response is too
>> > >>> big) and then we retry over TCP.
>> > >>>
>> > >>> This is what the state of the process looked like when it was leaking ports:
>> > >>>
>> > >>> (node@REDACTED)1> length(lists:filter(fun erlang:is_port/1, element(2,
>> > >>> erlang:process_info(whereis(dns_gen_server), links)))).
>> > >>> 577
>> > >>> (node@REDACTED)2> lists:usort([erlang:port_info(P, name) || P <-
>> > >>> lists:filter(fun erlang:is_port/1, element(2,
>> > >>> erlang:process_info(whereis(dns_gen_server), links)))]).
>> > >>> [{name,"udp_inet"}]
>> > >>>
>> > >>> The code looked like this, before the workaround was implemented:
>> > >>>
>> > >>> %% @spec dns(string()) -> [string()]
>> > >>> %% @doc Return the A records (IPv4 IPs) as strings for the given Host name.
>> > >>> %%     This may return an empty list if there no A records for this Host name.
>> > >>> dns(Host) when is_list(Host) ->
>> > >>>     dns(Host, fun inet_res:resolve/4).
>> > >>>
>> > >>> dns(Host, ResolveFun) ->
>> > >>>     case ResolveFun(Host, in, a, []) of
>> > >>>         {ok, Msg} ->
>> > >>>             ips_for_answers(Msg);
>> > >>>         {error, {nxdomain, _}} ->
>> > >>>             [];
>> > >>>         {error, timeout} ->
>> > >>>             %% retry with TCP
>> > >>>             case ResolveFun(Host, in, a, [{usevc, true}]) of
>> > >>>                 {ok, Msg} ->
>> > >>>                     ips_for_answers(Msg);
>> > >>>                 {error, {nxdomain, _}} ->
>> > >>>                     [];
>> > >>>                 Error = {error, _} ->
>> > >>>                     Error
>> > >>>             end;
>> > >>>         Error = {error, _} ->
>> > >>>             Error
>> > >>>     end.
>> > >>>
>> > >>> ips_for_answers(Msg) ->
>> > >>>     [inet_parse:ntoa(inet_dns:rr(Answer, data))
>> > >>>      || Answer <- inet_dns:msg(Msg, anlist)].
>> > >>>
>> > >>> The workaround we used was to call it indirectly with this function, I
>> > >>> couldn't find anything in OTP that did the same thing that didn't have
>> > >>> local call optimizations.
>> > >>>
>> > >>> %% @spec process_apply(atom(), atom(), [term()]) -> term()
>> > >>> %% @doc erlang:apply(M, F, A) in a temporary process and return the results.
>> > >>> process_apply(M,F,A) ->
>> > >>>     %% We can't just use rpc here because there's a local call optimization.
>> > >>>     Parent = self(),
>> > >>>     Fun = fun () ->
>> > >>>                   try
>> > >>>                       Parent ! {self(), erlang:apply(M, F, A)}
>> > >>>                   catch
>> > >>>                       Class:Reason ->
>> > >>>                           Stacktrace = erlang:get_stacktrace(),
>> > >>>                           Parent ! {self(), Class, Reason, Stacktrace}
>> > >>>                   end
>> > >>>           end,
>> > >>>     {Pid, Ref} = erlang:spawn_monitor(Fun),
>> > >>>     receive
>> > >>>         {Pid, Res} ->
>> > >>>             receive {'DOWN', Ref, process, Pid, _} -> ok end,
>> > >>>             Res;
>> > >>>         {Pid, Class, Reason, Stacktrace} ->
>> > >>>             receive {'DOWN', Ref, process, Pid, _} -> ok end,
>> > >>>             erlang:error(erlang:raise(Class, Reason, Stacktrace));
>> > >>>         {'DOWN', Ref, process, Pid, Reason} ->
>> > >>>             erlang:exit(Reason)
>> > >>>     end.
>> > >>>
>> > >>> ________________________________________________________________
>> > >>> erlang-bugs (at) erlang.org mailing list.
>> > >>> See http://www.erlang.org/faq.html
>> > >>> To unsubscribe; mailto:erlang-bugs-unsubscribe@REDACTED
>> > >>
>> > >> --
>> > >>
>> > >> / Raimo Niskanen, Erlang/OTP, Ericsson AB
>> > >>
>> > >
>> >
>> > ________________________________________________________________
>> > erlang-bugs (at) erlang.org mailing list.
>> > See http://www.erlang.org/faq.html
>> > To unsubscribe; mailto:erlang-bugs-unsubscribe@REDACTED
>> >
>>
>> --
>>
>> / Raimo Niskanen, Erlang/OTP, Ericsson AB
>>
>> ________________________________________________________________
>> erlang-bugs (at) erlang.org mailing list.
>> See http://www.erlang.org/faq.html
>> To unsubscribe; mailto:erlang-bugs-unsubscribe@REDACTED
>
> --
>
> / Raimo Niskanen, Erlang/OTP, Ericsson AB
>


More information about the erlang-bugs mailing list