[erlang-bugs] Build system ignores LDFLAGS

Davide Pesavento davidepesa@REDACTED
Fri Apr 17 23:34:49 CEST 2009


On Sat, Apr 4, 2009 at 13:05, Davide Pesavento <davidepesa@REDACTED> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 22:13, Davide Pesavento <davidepesa@REDACTED> wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Erlang's build system seems to ignore custom LDFLAGS. This is the QA
>> warning shown by Portage (Gentoo Linux's package manager) after
>> building R12B-5 with LDFLAGS="-Wl,-O1 -Wl,--as-needed
>> -Wl,--hash-style=gnu"
>>
>> QA Notice: Files built without respecting LDFLAGS have been detected
>>  Please include the following list of files in your report:
>> /usr/lib64/erlang/lib/runtime_tools-1.7.3/priv/lib/trace_file_drv.so
>> /usr/lib64/erlang/lib/runtime_tools-1.7.3/priv/lib/trace_ip_drv.so
>> /usr/lib64/erlang/lib/megaco-3.9.1.1/priv/lib/megaco_flex_scanner_drv_mt.so
>> /usr/lib64/erlang/lib/megaco-3.9.1.1/priv/lib/megaco_flex_scanner_drv.so
>> /usr/lib64/erlang/lib/erl_interface-3.5.9/bin/erl_call
>> /usr/lib64/erlang/lib/ssl-3.10/priv/bin/ssl_esock
>> /usr/lib64/erlang/lib/asn1-1.6.2/priv/lib/asn1_erl_drv.so
>> /usr/lib64/erlang/lib/crypto-1.5.3/priv/lib/crypto_drv.so
>> /usr/lib64/erlang/lib/common_test-1.3.4/priv/lib/erl_rx_driver.so
>> /usr/lib64/erlang/erts-5.6.5/bin/child_setup
>>
>> Before digging into the Makefiles, I'd like to know if you already
>> have some ideas about the root cause of this issue.
>>
>
> This bug is still present in R13A.
>
>  * QA Notice: Files built without respecting LDFLAGS have been detected
>  *  Please include the following list of files in your report:
>  * /usr/lib64/erlang/lib/runtime_tools-1.8/priv/lib/trace_file_drv.so
>  * /usr/lib64/erlang/lib/runtime_tools-1.8/priv/lib/trace_ip_drv.so
>  * /usr/lib64/erlang/lib/erl_interface-3.6/bin/erl_call
>  * /usr/lib64/erlang/lib/crypto-1.6/priv/lib/crypto_drv.so
>  * /usr/lib64/erlang/lib/megaco-3.10.0.1/priv/lib/megaco_flex_scanner_drv_mt.so
>  * /usr/lib64/erlang/lib/megaco-3.10.0.1/priv/lib/megaco_flex_scanner_drv.so
>  * /usr/lib64/erlang/lib/ssl-3.10.1/priv/bin/ssl_esock
>  * /usr/lib64/erlang/lib/asn1-1.6.8/priv/lib/asn1_erl_drv.so
>  * /usr/lib64/erlang/erts-5.7/bin/child_setup
>
> Best regards,
> Davide
>

The attached patch fixes the problem for me: LDFLAGS are now respected.

Regards,
Davide
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: erlang-R13A-LDFLAGS.patch
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 4225 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-bugs/attachments/20090417/b88fd2c7/attachment.obj>


More information about the erlang-bugs mailing list