A macro is defined the following way:
-define(Const, Replacement). -define(Func(Var1,...,VarN), Replacement).
A macro definition can be placed anyhere among the attributes and function declarations of a module, but the definition must come before any usage of the macro.
If a macro is used in several modules, it is recommended that the macro definition is placed in an include file.
A macro is used the following way:
?Const ?Func(Arg1,...,ArgN)
Macros are expanded during compilation. A simple macro
?Const
will be replaced with Replacement
.
Example:
-define(TIMEOUT, 200). ... call(Request) -> server:call(refserver, Request, ?TIMEOUT).
This will be expanded to:
call(Request) -> server:call(refserver, Request, 200).
A macro ?Func(Arg1,...,ArgN)
will be replaced with
Replacement
, where all occurences of a variable Var
from the macro definition are replaced with the corresponding
argument Arg
. Example:
-define(MACRO1(X, Y), {a, X, b, Y}). ... bar(X) -> ?MACRO1(a, b), ?MACRO1(X, 123)
This will be expanded to:
bar(X) -> {a,a,b,b}, {a,X,b,123}.
It is good programming practice, but not mandatory, to ensure that a macro definition is a valid Erlang syntactic form.
To view the result of macro expansion, a module can be compiled
with the 'P'
option. compile:file(File, ['P'])
.
This produces a listing of the parsed code after preprocessing
and parse transforms, in the file File.P
.
The following macros are predefined:
?MODULE
?MODULE_STRING
.
?FILE
.
?LINE
.
?MACHINE
.
'BEAM'
.
The following macro directives are supplied:
-undef(Macro).
-ifdef(Macro).
Macro
is
defined.
-ifndef(Macro).
Macro
is not
defined.
-else.
ifdef
or ifndef
directive. If that condition was false, the lines following
else
are evaluated instead.
-endif.
ifdef
or ifndef
directive.
Example:
-module(m). ... -ifdef(debug). -define(LOG(X), io:format("{~p,~p}: ~p~n", [?MODULE,?LINE,X])). -else. -define(LOG(X), true). -endif. ...
When trace output is desired, debug
should be defined
when the module m
is compiled:
% erlc -Ddebug m.erl or 1> c(m, {d, debug}). {ok,m}
?LOG(Arg)
will then expand to a call to io:format/2
and provide the user with some simple trace output.
The construction ??Arg
, where Arg
is a macro
argument, will be expanded to a string containing the tokens of
the argument. This is similar to the #arg
stringifying
construction in C.
The feature was added in Erlang 5.0/OTP R7.
Example:
-define(TESTCALL(Call), io:format("Call ~s: ~w~n", [??Call, Call])). ?TESTCALL(myfunction(1,2)), ?TESTCALL(you:function(2,1)).
results in
io:format("Call ~s: ~w~n",["myfunction ( 1 , 2 )",m:myfunction(1,2)]), io:format("Call ~s: ~w~n",["you : function ( 2 , 1 )",you:function(2,1)]).
That is, a trace output with both the function called and the resulting value.