This module provides an interface to the standard Erlang compiler. It can generate either a new file which contains the object code, or return a binary which can be loaded directly.
Is the same as file(File,
[verbose,report_errors,report_warnings])
.
file(File, Options) -> CompRet
CompRet = ModRet | BinRet | ErrRet
ModRet = {ok,ModuleName} | {ok,ModuleName,Warnings}
BinRet = {ok,ModuleName,Binary} | {ok,ModuleName,Binary,Warnings}
ErrRet = error | {error,Errors,Warnings}
Compiles the code in the file File
, which is an
Erlang source code file without the .erl
extension. Options
determine the behavior of the compiler.
Returns {ok,ModuleName}
if successful, or
error
if there are errors. An object code file is created if the compilation succeeds with no errors.
As a step in the compilation of Erlang code, erl_lint
is run, resulting in warning and error messages, if appropriate.
The options relevant to the syntactic and semantic controls of
erl_lint
are listed in the documentation of the module
erl_lint
.
The elements of Options
can be selected as
follows:
binary
{ok,ModuleName,Binary}
'P'
<File>.P
.
No object file is produced.
'E'
<File>.E
.
No object file is produced.
'S'
<File>.S
.
No object file is produced.
report_errors/report_warnings
report
report_errors
and
report_warnings
.
return_errors
{error,ErrorList,WarningList}
is returned when
there are errors.
return_warnings
WarningList
is added to the tuples returned on
success.
return
return_errors
and
return_warnings
.
verbose
{outdir,Dir}
export_all
{i,Dir}
Dir
to the list of directories to be searched
when including a file.
{d,Macro}
{d,Macro,Value}
Macro
to have the value
Value
. The default is true
).
{parse_transform,Module}
Module:parse_transform/2
to be applied to the
parsed code before the code is checked for errors.
asm
Note that all the options except the include path can also
be given in the file with a -compile([Option,...])
.
attribute.
For debugging of the compiler, or for pure curiosity,
the intermediate code generated by each compiler pass can
be inspected.
A complete list of the options to produce list files can
be printed by typing compile:options()
at the
Erlang shell prompt.
The options will be printed in order that the passes are executed.
If more than one listing option is used, the one representing the
earliest pass takes effect.
Unrecognized options are ignored.
Both WarningList
and ErrorList
have the
following format:
[{FileName,[ErrorInfo]}].
ErrorInfo
is described below. The file name
has been included here as the compiler uses the Erlang
pre-processor epp
, which allows the code to be included in
other files. For this reason, it is important to know to
which file an error or warning line number refers.
Is the same as forms(File,
[verbose,report_errors,report_warnings])
.
forms(Forms, Options) -> CompRet
Forms = [Form]
CompRet = ModRet | BinRet | ErrRet
ModRet = {ok,ModuleName} | {ok,ModuleName,Warnings}
BinRet = {ok,ModuleName,Binary} | {ok,ModuleName,Binary,Warnings}
ErrRet = error | {error,Errors,Warnings}
Analogous to file/1
, but takes a list of forms (in the
Erlang abstract format representation) as first argument.
The option binary
is implicit; i.e., no object code file
is produced. If the options indicate that a listing file should
be produced (e.g., 'E'), the module name is taken as the file name.
format_error(ErrorDescriptor) -> string()
ErrorDescriptor = errordesc()
Uses an ErrorDescriptor
and returns a string
which describes the error. This function is usually called
implicitly when an ErrorInfo
structure is processed.
See below.
The (host operating system) environment variable ERL_COMPILER_OPTIONS
can be used to give default compiler options.
Its value must be a valid Erlang term. If the value is a list, it will
be used as is. If it is not a list, it will be put into a list.
The list will be appended to any options given to file/2
or forms/2
.
The compiler can now do function inlining within an Erlang module.
Inlining means that a call to a function is replaced with the function
body with the arguments replaced with the actual values. The semantics
are preserved, except if exceptions are generated in the inlined code.
Exceptions will be reported as occurring in the function the body was
inlined into. Also, function_clause
exceptions will be converted
to similar case_clause
exceptions.
When a function is inlined, the original function may be kept as a separate function as well, because there might still be calls to it. Therefore, inlining almost always increases code size.
Inlining does not necessarily improve running time, especially if large functions are inlined. The increased code size may cause the code to run the slower (because of worse CPU cache performance). Also, inlining may increase Beam stack usage which will probably be detrimental to performance for recursive functions.
Inlining is never default; it must be explicitly enabled with a
compiler option or a '-compile()
' attribute in the source module.
There are two distinct ways to enable inlining (which may be combined).
The first way is to explicitly list the functions to be inlined at
all call places. The syntax is {inline,[{F,A},...]}
, where F
is a function name and A
its arity.
Example from an Erlang module:
-compile({inline,[{mkop,3},{mkop,2},{line,1}]}).
Here the functions mkop/3
, mkop/2
, and line/1
will be inlined every time they are used.
This type of unconditional inlining is useful for small, simple functions as an alternative to macros. The functions mentioned in the example are defined like this:
mkop(L, {Op,Pos}, R) -> {op,Pos,Op,L,R}. mkop({Op,Pos}, A) -> {op,Pos,Op,A}. line(Tup) -> element(2, Tup).
There are other benefits when using explicit inlining instead of macros. The arguments will only be evaluated once, which can be critical if they contain side effects or are large computations, and it also makes it easy to have local variables, which is difficult with macros.
The other type of inlining is conditional inlining. The compiler will search for candiates suitable for inlining. It does this by calculating a weight for each function. The weight is roughly proportional to the size of the function. Given the weight for each function, the compiler will only inline functions lighter than calling function and below a given threshold value.
To enable conditional inlining, you can use the 'inline
' option,
which sets a threshold value of 10, or you can explicitly give a
threshold value like this: {inline,Threshold}
.
Example:
-compile({inline,1000}).
A threshold of 1000 would inline most functions (except for extremly large), provided that the functions are lighter than the functions they are inlined into. It is not clear that this is a good idea. It all depends on your code.
Conditional inlining should be used with caution, since it may actually increase the execution time and make debugging harder. You should only use it for modules that are known to be bottle-necks and measure execution times with and without inlining. |
Parse transformations are used when a programmer wants to use Erlang syntax but with different semantics. The original Erlang code is then transformed into other Erlang code.
The ErrorInfo
mentioned above is the standard
ErrorInfo
structure which is returned from all IO
modules. It has the following format
{ErrorLine, Module, ErrorDescriptor}
A string describing the error is obtained with the following call:
apply(Module, format_error, ErrorDescriptor)
epp, erl_id_trans, erl_lint